Blog

Expand your understanding of latest research and current workplace challenges.

Incivility Risk: Time to Connect the Dots (4)

Having seen the effects of workplace incivility on key organizational indicators, how do HR folks deal with the issue?
With their ability to take meaningful action limited by the (very) questionable support they get from management, here’s what HR folks do:

  • They get busy revising policies (69%), however only 7% initiate the creation of Team Charters that would help employees take ownership of these revised policies.
  • They provide training to management (51%) and front line staff (54%), but only 17% are able to create an overall strategic organizational response.
  • 34% hang posters, distribute pamphlets and do newsletters write-ups, however only 34% make it `a topic of conversation across the organization’.
  • And many, as gleaned from the survey’s open comments sections, simply `do nothing’, or they deal with the issue on a case-by-case basis.

These results point to a glaring incongruence between the magnitude of the incivility risk (we’ve covered that in the previous entries in this series) and organizational responses to it. The organizational resources dedicated to solving the problem dwarf in comparison with the costs associated with its impact.
But before we get all up-in-arms about a lack of initiative and focus on HR’s part, it might be worth looking at the (very real) obstacles they face.
Which is exactly what I’ll do next week, in the final instalment of this series!

Incivility Risk: Time to Connect the Dots (3)

So what happens when HR gets a complaint about workplace incivility? (= those seemingly inconsequential, discourteous or rude words or actions, where the intent to harm is ambiguous at best.)

Okay, we’ve established through the recent HR Reporter survey that workplace incivility does impact key organizational indicators. However, a set of questions about how organizations respond to it revealed a troubling reality.

As the numbers below show, we see within HR itself large pockets which lack both confidence and skill in dealing with the issue. This is true despite the fact that 73% of survey respondents comprised of executives, managers and supervisors, and another 17% identified themselves as `senior individual contributors’.

When asked about their reaction when they received formal or informal civility-related complaint…

  • 77% “wished they had more knowledge and tools to deal with this situation”
  • 39% “felt unsure how to handle the situation”
  • 37% did not “know exactly what to do” to fix it
  • 81% “wish management was more aware of how incivility impacts the business”
  • 72% “wish they had more organizational support”

This lack of information and skills is disconcerting. It demonstrates that there’s little understanding and support from the organization’s management tiers. And it also shows that HR’s lack of skill leads to a compromised ability to support the business and its leaders – and that HR professionals may inadvertently mishandle situations.

So how do organizations actually handle incivility on the ground? We asked about that too, and I’ll relay the data to you next week!

Incivility Risk: Time to Connect the Dots (2)

We’re back with the hot-off-the-press of the first ever cross-Canada survey on workplace incivility!

As seen from HR’s unique vantage point, incivility is exceedingly damaging to business. An overwhelming majority of our 308 respondents `strongly agreed’ or `somewhat agreed’ that incivility has a significant negative effect on crucial organizational indicators.

Here’s where they saw its impact…  ready for some striking data? here goes:

  • Effects on productivity: 92% observed that incivility had negative effects in this domain.
  • Customer service: 72% noted impact in the arena.
  • Absenteeism: 79%
  • Talent retention: 78%
  • Interdepartmental collaboration: 90%
  • Damage to brand reputation: 52%

These figures tell us that incivility poses a tangible risk to organizations. Previous U.S.-based research has already pointed to a relationship between incivility and similar organizational indicators, however our survey’s high figures go well beyond what has been previously observed. What respondents relayed is that this seemingly benign form of bad behaviour comes with hefty price tags. When your brand is eroding, customers are going elsewhere, you’re having difficulty attracting and retaining talent and the cost of sick leaves is rising, your capacity to carry out the organization’s objectives is severely hampered.

Given this, you’d naturally assume that organizations, and their HR professionals, would be busy dealing with this risk head on. You’d surely expect them to be equipped with the necessary skills and confidence, right?

Well, wrong again.

Stay tuned to hear what organizations do in response to incivility!

Incivility Risk: Time to Connect the Dots (1)

Consider this: if we define incivility as `seemingly inconsequential, rude or discourteous words and actions’, it would be utterly logical to assume that its effects on the workplace would be equally inconsequential, right?
Well, wrong!

Indeed, a survey I designed in conjunction with the Canadian HR Reporter magazine (published October 12th , 2011) demonstrates that the exact opposite is true. The data in this survey was the first data of its kind collected here in Canada. And the findings are striking, even shocking.
Have you experienced problems with incivility in your workplace? If so, please stick around for the next few blog entries. I will share with you relevant information extracted from this survey; it will likely be helpful to you in your own role within your organization.
For starters, some stats: 308 Human Resources professionals provided online responses to the questionnaire. 73% of respondents were HR executives, managers and supervisors, another 17% identified themselves as `senior individual contributors’.
The responses covered all Canadian provinces, coast to coast, from organizations ranging in size from one to 5,000+. As to frequency of incivility, most of the respondents relayed that they recieve formal or informal complaints about Incivility (as defined above), on a regular basis, up to 15 times in a six months’ period.
I had the privilege of presenting the survey’s results at the 2011 Health Work and Wellness conference in downtown Toronto on the very day of publication in the HR Reporter. I dare say that the audience was hugely impacted by these findings (and other eye-opening information related to workplace incivility which I was pleased to share).
So please do stick around, more to come next week!

My Pet Language Peeve

Warning: there’s a good chance that in the last 24 hours, dozens or even hundreds of times, you’ve compromised your personal power, image and expertise.

Wonder how I know this and what on earth you might have done to deserve such harsh criticism?

Well, it’s simple. Chances are that you’ve peppered your speech with lots of unnecessary fillers. Some of them may have gone unnoticed, others may have annoyed your listeners, and yet others may have outright damaged you in seemingly small but corrosive ways.

Here are some of the phrases you may have used, along with some blunt commentary…..

  • “To be honest…”  – why, have you not been honest up until now? (Leaders beware, using this phrase feeds into people’s innate mistrust of management)
  • “Sort of” and “kind of” -  the current winners in Canadian popularity contests. “Sort of” strips your speech of all conviction and sense of expertise. (For example, do we really “have the winning product” or only “sort of” have it?)
  • “Really” – a highly useful word when used properly to emphasize a word or idea. Even when used as occasional filler, it’s quite harmless. But when used 5 times in the course of 7 sentences, it robs everything around it of intensity and meaning. And you too are in danger of seeming bland and monotonous.
  • “Know what I mean?” – frankly, at some point, after being asked this again and again (and yet again) , I won’t WANT to know what you mean!
  • “Alright?” or “okay?” - are you really asking if people are `alright’ with your idea? If so, stop and listen. If not, cut it out.

There are many more fillers (`basically’, `pretty much’, `actually’, and of course ‘like’, to name a few), but the above seem to be most prevalent these days. They all make you look tentative, unsure, a non-expert. And they grade on people’s nerves to boot.

Here’s a great way to kick your habit:

Ask someone who sees you often to partner with you. Their job is to comment every time you employ your beloved filler. Your job is to put a dollar in a charity box every time they – or you! – catch yourself doing so. This strategy will cure you in no time.

HOWEVER, in being the coach helping people apply this strategy, I have found that a new habit tends to immediately replace the old one – it just sneaks up on you while you’re busy tending to the first one! So pay careful attention…

Now, go out there and reclaim your personal power and image!

__________________________________________

PS  one of you had written the following in response to the above:

Well, actually to be totally honest I sort of get this blog and I kind of like it , if you know what I mean. Okay?

What Makes a Group Stupid?

What reduces a group’s collective intelligence? Well, the Carnegie Melon University research I mentioned last week suggests that a dominant, even abrasive person can do exactly that. “In groups where one person dominated, the group was less collectively intelligent than in groups where the conversational turns were more evenly distributed,” says Anita Williams-Woolley, the lead researcher.

Frankly, this is not surprising, is it? You may have noticed this phenomenon yourself!

When people are afraid of someone, they become risk averse. They shift into survival-and-safety mode. In this mode, creative problem solving is inhibited and conformity reigns.

You may have noticed that this problem is magnified when the abrasive person happens to be the formal leader, one who has real power to actually `punish’ people. So what do people do when the boss is abrasive? They stop innovating. They resign. They go on sick leave. They speak badly of the company. And that’s a very partial list.

So you – yes, you! – the one sitting quietly in your chair while this is going on and behaving like it doesn’t concern you…. what are you going to do about it the next time the dominant person gets control and everyone retreats into their protective shells?

As the French author Anais Nin’s put it: “Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one’s courage”. We all have a choice in how much we want to impact the environment around us for the better.

(PS  Speaking of abrasive behaviour, I’m in the early stages of launching a unique program designed to help organizations turn around the behaviour of abrasive managers. It’s called “Boss Whispering”. I’ll tell you more about it when it’s fully rolled out, but do feel free to contact me anytime for assistance or inquiries.)

What Makes a Group Smart?

Take a guess: which of the following factors will most contribute to a group’s `collective intelligence’ in solving difficult problems and performing tasks?

a) Group members’ cumulative individual I.Q. levels

b) The number of women in the group

c) The presence of a dominant group member

d) The freedom to make mistakes without suffering negative ramifications

If you chose `B’ (did you?), you were right!

Surprisingly, according to new research from Carnegie Melon University, “Having a bunch of smart people in a group doesn’t necessarily make the group smart”.

These researchers had 699 people placed in groups of two to five. The groups worked together on tasks that ranged from visual puzzles to negotiations, brainstorming, games and complex rule-based design assignments. What they did not at all expect to find is this: the more women in the group, the better the group’s `collective intelligence’.

The exact reasons for this result require further research. However, initial analysis of the data led the researchers to conclude that “higher social sensitivity exhibited by females,” contributed to these results.

There was another intriguing piece to this research… stay tuned!

Surprising Happiness Facts

What if I told you that people in war-torn Afghanistan are probably happier than you are? And that the same might be true for Russians living in areas of high unemployment? And would you believe me if I said that your 76-year old aunt Doris, with her small pension and tiny living quarters, is probably much happier than you are?

Chances are you’d tell me to quit the nonsense and maybe even unsubscribe yourself from this blog.

But the highly respected Carol Graham of the Brookings Institution in Washington D.C. has made it her business to study happiness around the world and the above are some of her findings.

Amongst her most intriguing finding are the following two: first, people are remarkable at adapting to extreme adversity and maintaining their natural cheerfulness. Indeed, respondents in Afghanistan, where poverty resembles that of sub-Saharan Africa are happier than the world average, and Russians living in contexts of high unemployment are happier than the average Russian.

Graham’s research revealed that people can adapt to tremendous adversity and retain their cheerfulness, or they can have virtually everything — including good health — and be miserable. She found that a critical factor that people have a hard time adapting to is uncertainty. Thus, in the USA during the 2008 economic crises, while the Dow Jones had a free-fall, happiness levels suffered a parallel fall. But when the market stopped falling and some stability was restored in March, average happiness recovered much faster than the Dow, despite the fact that people had to make do with less income or wealth.

And here’s the second and really striking finding: age and happiness have a consistent U-shaped relationship, with the turning point in the mid- to late-40s, when happiness begins to increase (as long as health and domestic partnerships stay sound). I.e. your happiness level decreases from the age of 18, reaching its lowest point somewhere in your mid-forties. And from there, it only gets better and better!

So what does all this mean from an organizational perspective? Here are two tiny nuggets to consider. First, as much as possible, try eliminating unnecessary uncertainty. And then, make sure to have lots of younger folks and older folks on your payroll. After all, they’re likely to be happier and just might spread that around!

Swear at Work?

Many of you have told me over the years that swearing on the job is one of the best stress-alleviating methods. Well, now you can find solid support for your position in new research that shows that swearing does help alleviate pain.  

Scientists from Britain’s Keele University had student volunteers place their hands in a bucket of ice-cold water while swearing repeatedly. They then repeated the exercise using a harmless phrase instead. Turns out subjects were able to keep their hands submerged in the icy water for longer when repeating the swear word.

So should we indeed accept and maybe even encourage swearing in the workplace as a legitimate tool for dealing with those days when you really do need effective relief from all that craziness?

Well, here’s the problem: while you might enjoy a healthy dose of stress-alleviation when you utter those juicy swear words, your actions might be causing pain for those around you. They might find it stressful, offensive and poisonous. It will likely interfere with their concentration and performance.  

In that balancing act that every organization has to do between its people’s `freedom to’ (i.e. your freedom to express yourself) and the `freedom from’ (i.e. someone else’s freedom to perform at their best and be shielded from offensive disruption), the `freedom from’  will always trump the `freedom to’.

So what about the benefits swearing? Well, you can always utter profanities and shake your fists in the air in the privacy of your car or home. At work, you’re better off using other stress-reducing practices.

Incivility: Tackling the Problem Boss

Last time, we looked at all the not-so-effective ways for dealing with an incivil boss.
So what does work? Well, my advice is probably similar to what your grandmother could have told you:

  • Muster the courage to speak up constructively (the boss is probably not even aware of the impact of her behaviour).
  • Set clear boundaries, gradually and gracefully.
  • Take good care of yourself, because when all is said and done, you are all that you’ve got.
  • Replace your habitual Velcro with a Teflon-inspired existence so that you can allow things to slide right off you.
  • Remain mentally in your own business rather than meddling in theirs.
  • Remind yourself that this is just a job, it does not define you.
  • Take the issue to someone who has potential influence, because there’s a good chance that with a bit of competent coaching this boss’s behaviour can be turned around.

But what if, you may ask, despite your best efforts, nothing changes?

Well, then, it’s time to polish the dust off your résumé and go find a better workplace, where you can safely park your talent, body and soul.

LEARNING Hub

Access free learning tools, articles and other resources for you and your team.

REAL™ Solutions for Abrasive Leaders

Find out how you, as a senior executive or HR leader, can help restore the effectiveness of an abrasive leader.

REAL™ Training Services

Discover how our training programs will energize and grow your people.

REAL™ Organizational Solutions

Find out how we can help you with organizational development and initiatives.
Copyright © 2011 Sharone Bar-David. All Rights Reserved. Website by Geist Creative.